<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>practicalphoto.com</title>
	<link>http://practicalphoto.com</link>
	<description>anyone can shoot great photos!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Close-ups the easy way</title>
		<link>http://practicalphoto.com/2008/08/08/close-ups-the-easy-way/</link>
		<comments>http://practicalphoto.com/2008/08/08/close-ups-the-easy-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>photodude</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Photo Tips</dc:subject><dc:subject>closeup</dc:subject><dc:subject>nikon</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalphoto.com/2008/08/08/close-ups-the-easy-way/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you enjoy shooting close-ups? But hate shelving $$ to buy new equipment?
Here&#8217;s an easy way.I have been using the Nikon Closeup filter for couple years now. Unlike ordinary magnifying glasses, where lines near the edges could be distorted, the Nikon Closeup has been designed for this purpose.It doesn&#8217;t matter whether you have a SLR, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you enjoy shooting close-ups? But hate shelving $$ to buy new equipment?</p>
<p><center><!--adsense#bannerlink--></center>Here&#8217;s an easy way.I have been using the Nikon Closeup filter for couple years now. Unlike ordinary magnifying glasses, where lines near the edges could be distorted, the Nikon Closeup has been designed for this purpose.It doesn&#8217;t matter whether you have a SLR, compact camera or whatever equipment, you could always plug one in front of the lens.I use it with my Kodak digital point-and-shoot, holding the filter with my fingers.</p>
<p><img width="90%" src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/nikon_4t" /></p>
<p><center><!--adsense#banner--></center>They come in various strengths, from 1T to 4T with the higher number being the stronger power. If you desire even more magnification, you could mount couple of them together. Great stuff!Here&#8217;s pics I shot with this filter.<img width="90%" src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/2n3819_in_m3" /></p>
<p><img width="90%" src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/rca_closeup" /></p>
<p>Note the  shallow depth of field, allowing you to totally isolate your subject from busy backgrounds.</p>
<p>Of course, you need to use your camera&#8217;s Closeup mode and please please please disable the flash function. They usually don&#8217;t work well. Bring your subject outdoors if possible for best lighting.
</p>
<a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=closeup" rel="tag">closeup</a>  <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=nikon" rel="tag">nikon</a><a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=closeup" rel="tag">closeup</a>, <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=nikon" rel="tag">nikon</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://practicalphoto.com/2008/08/08/close-ups-the-easy-way/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Create Contrast by Mixing/Blending Natural/Aritificial Lights</title>
		<link>http://practicalphoto.com/2007/12/25/create-contrast-by-mixingblending-naturalaritificial-lights/</link>
		<comments>http://practicalphoto.com/2007/12/25/create-contrast-by-mixingblending-naturalaritificial-lights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 02:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>photodude</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Photo Tips</dc:subject><dc:subject>contrast</dc:subject><dc:subject>lighting</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalphoto.com/2007/12/25/create-contrast-by-mixingblending-naturalaritificial-lights/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah&#8230; This is one of the easiest way to create drama, contrast in your photos.
Photographed at dusk or dawn, natural light will tend to take a hue, a bluish or reddish tint. Contrast this with the warm glow of of a tungsten (oops, in this environmentally challenged days, go for warm glow energy saving bulbs), [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8230; This is one of the easiest way to create drama, contrast in your photos.</p>
<p>Photographed at dusk or dawn, natural light will tend to take a hue, a bluish or reddish tint. Contrast this with the warm glow of of a tungsten (oops, in this environmentally challenged days, go for warm glow energy saving bulbs), and you have drama, contrast and of course, deep saturated colours.</p>
<p>Sounds so easy? It is! </p>
<p>Only snag is, you got to train your eye as the camera doesn&#8217;t see things like our human eyes. Also, timing plays a very very important role here. Shoot the scene 5 minutes later, and things look very different.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what this scene looks like.</p>
<p><img src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/fokuang_temple1.jpg"></p>
<p>5 minutes later!</p>
<p><img src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/fokuang_temple2.jpg"></p>
<p>See how dramatic a contrast 5 minute makes! Believe me, the actual scenery doesn&#8217;t look like that. The sky wasn&#8217;t that dark but the camera sees things differently. </p>
<p>In this digital age, just keep on shooting, every 5 minutes. Once you see the effect you want, you have trained your eye! Easy!</p>
<p>My Norwegian friend here, Knut-Jonas sends pics of his house. Same concept. </p>
<p><img src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/kj_house.jpg"></p>
<p>One more reason to walk around your neighbourhood during the evenings. Your wife thinks you are romantic too, until you begin to snap pics.  : )</p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
<a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=contrast" rel="tag">contrast</a>  <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=lighting" rel="tag">lighting</a><a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=contrast" rel="tag">contrast</a>, <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=lighting" rel="tag">lighting</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://practicalphoto.com/2007/12/25/create-contrast-by-mixingblending-naturalaritificial-lights/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dumb Down Exposure</title>
		<link>http://practicalphoto.com/2007/01/30/17/</link>
		<comments>http://practicalphoto.com/2007/01/30/17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>photodude</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Photo Tips</dc:subject><dc:subject>exposure</dc:subject><dc:subject>lighting</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalphoto.com/2007/01/30/17/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When taking pictures, it is worthwhile remembering your camera is just a piece of equipment. Yes, it has some smarts, but that is still no substitue for the human brain &#8212; you.
One of my pet peeve is improperly exposed photos. Now as smart as we would like them to be, except for the most advanced [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When taking pictures, it is worthwhile remembering your camera is just a piece of equipment. Yes, it has some smarts, but that is still no substitue for the human brain &#8212; you.</p>
<p>One of my pet peeve is improperly exposed photos. Now as smart as we would like them to be, except for the most advanced types of exposure cells like those in the Nikon flagship F5, most camera sensors just do not see/understand <strong>colors</strong>.</p>
<p>Why is this a problem? It affects your exposure! You see, the camera&#8217;s exposure meter will adjust everything for middle exposure. Meaning it won&#8217;t be over-exposed, it won&#8217;t be under-exposed but the exposure will be just right at the center. The proper term is, the camera adjusts for 18% grey tone. Between white and black, the middle zone will be an 18% grey. This is where the problem with colours appear.</p>
<p>White is perceived as <strong>too bright, too much light</strong>, so your camera will <strong>reduce</strong> the exposure.<br />
Black is perceived as <strong>too dark, not bright enough</strong>, so your camera will <strong>increase</strong> the exposure.</p>
<p>Yellow is a brigher than blue, maroon is darker than pink&#8230;</p>
<p>Get the picture?</p>
<p>Now if the subjects in your pics &#8220;blend&#8221; out to 18% grey tone (which most of the time this works), then everything&#8217;s okay. However, if you are shooting a pure white, or black subject&#8230; you have been warned!</p>
<p>Take these 3 photos of Vishnu, the Hindu deity.</p>
<p>The first was shot directly.</p>
<p><img src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/vishnu1.jpg" /><br />
This time, I set the exposure to +1. Look for &#8220;Exposure Adjustment/Compensation&#8221;. We call this &#8220;increase by one stop&#8221;.</p>
<p><img src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/vishnu2.jpg" /><br />
Lastly, increased by &#8220;two stops&#8221;, or set to +2.</p>
<p><img src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/vishnu3.jpg" /><br />
As you can see above, a +2 exposure compensation is required for a pure white subject. So if you are shooting a pure black subject, like a black cat, a -2 exposure compensation will be just right.</p>
<p><!--adsense#bannerlink-->
</p>
<a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=exposure" rel="tag">exposure</a>  <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=lighting" rel="tag">lighting</a><a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=exposure" rel="tag">exposure</a>, <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=lighting" rel="tag">lighting</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://practicalphoto.com/2007/01/30/17/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Very powerful Photo Editing software</title>
		<link>http://practicalphoto.com/2006/11/13/very-powerful-photo-editing-software/</link>
		<comments>http://practicalphoto.com/2006/11/13/very-powerful-photo-editing-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>photodude</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Photo Software</dc:subject><dc:subject>editing photos</dc:subject><dc:subject>gimp</dc:subject><dc:subject>software</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalphoto.com/2006/11/13/very-powerful-photo-editing-software/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Previously, I was told the most powerful photo editing software is Adobe Photoshop. And it probably is still the best to use. However, the Open Source world has a worthy alternative. For FREE.  
Gimp, the GNU Image Manipulation Program.
http://gimp.org
Now installing is a piece of cake but using it might not be that intuitive if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Previously, I was told the most powerful photo editing software is Adobe Photoshop. And it probably is still the best to use. However, the Open Source world has a worthy alternative. For FREE. <img src='http://practicalphoto.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Gimp, the GNU Image Manipulation Program.</p>
<p><a href="http://gimp.org"><img src="http://gimp.org/images/news-icons/wilber_wizard.png">http://gimp.org</a></p>
<p>Now installing is a piece of cake but using it might not be that intuitive if you are new to photo editing. But if you played with Photoshop before, that helps!</p>
<p>I wanted to create a photo montage of my new product and none of the photo editing software in my Mac could cut it, so here comes Gimp!</p>
<p>First, I cleaned up the background of my 2 subjects. Using the &#8220;magic wand tool&#8221;, you could select the region around your subject, then &#8220;Cut&#8221; away all the &#8220;clutter&#8221;. Works like magic. <img src='http://practicalphoto.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  Also, you could rotate your subject to the desired orientation.</p>
<p>From<br />
<img src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/usb_dac.jpg"> </p>
<p>to<br />
<img src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/usb-1.jpg"></p>
<p>
<!--adsense#banner--></p>
<p>
</p>
<p>From<br />
<img src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/usb_dac2.jpg"> </p>
<p>to<br />
<img src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/usb_2.jpg"></p>
<p>Place each image in a separate &#8220;layer&#8221;, then you could place them together. This is the montage I created.</p>
<p><img src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/usb-convertor.jpg"></p>
<p>The controls might look intimidating but it&#8217;s actually quite easy. Go through the documentation to start out. Or just spend some time playing with it. </p>
<a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=editing-photos" rel="tag">editing photos</a>, <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=gimp" rel="tag">gimp</a>  <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=software" rel="tag">software</a><a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=editing-photos" rel="tag">editing photos</a>, <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=gimp" rel="tag">gimp</a>, <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=software" rel="tag">software</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://practicalphoto.com/2006/11/13/very-powerful-photo-editing-software/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If your camera isn&#8217;t smart enough, you&#8217;ll have to be smart</title>
		<link>http://practicalphoto.com/2006/10/03/15/</link>
		<comments>http://practicalphoto.com/2006/10/03/15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>photodude</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Photo Tips</dc:subject><dc:subject>composition</dc:subject><dc:subject>lighting</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalphoto.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just have to show everyone the new pair of speakers I built, so I decided to lug them out for a photo shoot. Available light is still best!
However, as I placed them in my car porch, the much brighter background poses problems to me.
If you just Point and Shoot, this is what you&#8217;ll get.

 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just have to show everyone the new pair of speakers I built, so I decided to lug them out for a photo shoot. Available light is still best!</p>
<p>However, as I placed them in my car porch, the much brighter background poses problems to me.</p>
<p>If you just Point and Shoot, this is what you&#8217;ll get.</p>
<p><a href="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/jordan_a.jpg"><br />
<img src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/jordan_a.jpg"></a> <!--adsense--><br />
Note that due to the much brighter background, the camera&#8217;s light meter adjusts exposure for the background, thus the foreground, your subject, is now under-exposed.<br />
Damn&#8230;</p>
<p>You could use some flash to fill in the subject. Like below.<br />
<a href="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/jordan_b.jpg"><br />
<img src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/jordan_b.jpg"></a><br />
The background is now nicely exposed but the flash highlights are a distraction. It just looks so unnatural.<br />
Damn&#8230;</p>
<p>You could take the subject out so that they are all illuminated under the same light, or there is another way though. Just recompose your shot to show less of the bright background.<br />
<a href="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/jordan_c.jpg"><br />
<img src="http://practicalphoto.com/photos/jordan_c.jpg"></a><br />
See? By omitting the sky in the background, the camera now doesn&#8217;t have to grapple with the overly bright sky. The background building is over-exposed but it doesn&#8217;t matter as it serves to reduce background clutter.</p>
<p>Now the subject is nicely exposed and I get to show them off on my website. <img src='http://practicalphoto.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=composition" rel="tag">composition</a>  <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=lighting" rel="tag">lighting</a><a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=composition" rel="tag">composition</a>, <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=lighting" rel="tag">lighting</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://practicalphoto.com/2006/10/03/15/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John&#8217;s Photo Galleries</title>
		<link>http://practicalphoto.com/2006/09/23/johns-photo-galleries/</link>
		<comments>http://practicalphoto.com/2006/09/23/johns-photo-galleries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>photodude</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Recommended Websites</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalphoto.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
I got to know John Amato when he bought something from me more than a year ago. He told me he was posted to China. Little did I know he&#8217;s a photographer as well!
The photos in his gallery show how powerful still images can be. In the hands of a deft photographer, all kinds [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img  src="http://i.pbase.com/g4/14/637114/3/61249608.twobikes.jpg"> </p>
<p>I got to know John Amato when he bought something from me more than a year ago. He told me he was posted to China. Little did I know he&#8217;s a photographer as well!</p>
<p>The photos in his gallery show how powerful still images can be. In the hands of a deft photographer, all kinds of emotions can be coaxed out of the viewer. </p>
<p>The section on the poor/needy is particularly touching. If you feel something when looking at these photos, they have done their job!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbase.com/jamato8">Visit John&#8217;s photo gallery.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://practicalphoto.com/2006/09/23/johns-photo-galleries/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you have Out of Focus Photos?</title>
		<link>http://practicalphoto.com/2006/09/19/do-you-have-out-of-focus-photos/</link>
		<comments>http://practicalphoto.com/2006/09/19/do-you-have-out-of-focus-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 09:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>photodude</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Photo Tips</dc:subject><dc:subject>composition</dc:subject><dc:subject>equipment</dc:subject><dc:subject>focus</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalphoto.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
With autofocus, you shouldn&#8217;t have any focussing problem. But sometimes they do crop up.
Most cameras use the viewfinder center as the focus area. Any subject placed at this spot will be focussed sharply. 
This is bad for composition as it encourages you to &#8220;use your camera like a gun&#8221;, resulting in dull photos with subjects [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--adsense#bannerlink--></p>
<p>With autofocus, you shouldn&#8217;t have any focussing problem. But sometimes they do crop up.</p>
<p>Most cameras use the viewfinder center as the focus area. Any subject placed at this spot will be focussed sharply. </p>
<p>This is bad for composition as it encourages you to <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/?p=11">&#8220;use your camera like a gun&#8221;</a>, resulting in dull photos with subjects only in the center.</p>
<p>For <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/?page_id=5">composition</a> sake, it&#8217;s best to place the subject Off center, but how to maintain sharp focus this way?</p>
<p>Fortunately, there is an easy way. Place your subject at the center of the viewfinder as before. Then press the shutter release key, not fully, but midway through. While still holding the shutter release key, recompose your shot by placing the subject elsewhere on the frame. Doing this, you&#8217;ll have the subject still sharp in focus.</p>
<p>Some cameras have very advanced focussing mechanism (using a microprocessor just for this!), with a much wider focussing area, or with eye sensors to detect movement of your eye. Nikon even has &#8220;Face Priority&#8221; focussing to help you. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m really not a fan of this as I prefer to decide which subject I want to focus on, rather than let the camera decide for  me.</p>
<p>Try the above tip and let me know!</p>
<a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=composition" rel="tag">composition</a>, <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=equipment" rel="tag">equipment</a>  <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=focus" rel="tag">focus</a><a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=composition" rel="tag">composition</a>, <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=equipment" rel="tag">equipment</a>, <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=focus" rel="tag">focus</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://practicalphoto.com/2006/09/19/do-you-have-out-of-focus-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Use Your Camera like a Gun</title>
		<link>http://practicalphoto.com/2006/09/18/dont-use-your-camera-like-a-gun/</link>
		<comments>http://practicalphoto.com/2006/09/18/dont-use-your-camera-like-a-gun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>photodude</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Photo Tips</dc:subject><dc:subject>composition</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalphoto.com/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm&#8230; I thought it&#8217;ll be nice to have a weekly photo tip. Actually I&#8217;m just too lazy to organize them so hopefully this will be easier to follow.
Yes, don&#8217;t use your camera like a gun. When shooting, most folks do it literally by aiming the center of the viewfinder at the main subject and just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; I thought it&#8217;ll be nice to have a weekly photo tip. Actually I&#8217;m just too lazy to organize them so hopefully this will be easier to follow.</p>
<p>Yes, don&#8217;t use your camera like a gun. When shooting, most folks do it literally by aiming the center of the viewfinder at the main subject and just shoot.  </p>
<p><!--adsense#banner--></p>
<p>This results in subjects being dead right in the center, looking very very dull.</p>
<p>Hopefully you have read the <a href="http://practicalphoto.com/?page_id=5">Composition</a> page on how to compose your shot.</p>
<p>By moving the subject off-center, you already achieve this goal! </p>
<p>So please, your camera is not a gun. And your subject, not your bull&#8217;s eye!</p>
<a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=composition" rel="tag">composition</a><a href="http://practicalphoto.com/index.php?tag=composition" rel="tag">composition</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://practicalphoto.com/2006/09/18/dont-use-your-camera-like-a-gun/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
